Comments on: AGENT-GATE

By: A770Tiger

A770Tiger — Sat, 31 Jul 2010 04:58:46 +0000

Beau, congrats on your team’s win and first title. That being said, if you have enough brain matter to research our history why in the world weren’t you smart enough to pick an institution better than Carolina? They picked a chicken as a fucking mascot! The fans revel in calling themselves cocks–of course, we enjoy calling them that too. They eat their own mascot on a sandwich if their football team scores 21 points. Their stadium sits among dilapidated fair grounds. Lou Holtz and Steve Spurrier haven’t been able to win with them. They hide behind their conference brothers’ reputation. They parade around a rooster on a stick. Damn son, you seem to be fairly literate, but you went full fucking tard in making yourself a cock. That is your fault, not ours. So, find a 12-step program or call Doctor Phil to help you overcome, and quit trying to make yourself feel better by projecting the negativity of your dumb-ass mistakes onto us. Your team won a title after more than a century of trying, way to go, now get the cock out of your mouth, your head out of your ass, quit hating on us, and learn Tiger Rag as a first step to joining an institution you can be proud of. Oh, and GO TIGERS!!!!!

By: Willy Mac

Willy Mac — Sat, 31 Jul 2010 00:31:28 +0000

13 – Oh no, cheap cock related humor is fine if you stick to dick jokes. Sorry for being so forward, it just made me have that tickly feeling in the back of my throat when I read it.

By: Douche.O

Douche.O — Fri, 30 Jul 2010 16:57:09 +0000

@ 12- Sorry I will try to step my game up. I have never seen said Tigernet, however I will refrain from cheap, cock related humor.

By: Willy Mac

Willy Mac — Fri, 30 Jul 2010 15:08:38 +0000

@11 – Tigernet humor equals frowny face

By: Douche.O

Douche.O — Fri, 30 Jul 2010 12:49:54 +0000

I give all due credit to South Carolina winning the College Baseball World Series, good job dicks……errr, Cocks. With that said, please don’t come on to our message board talking shit about something damn near thirty years ago. Clemson doesn’t have to rub that national championship in Sakerlina’s face, we just point to our record against you;

65-38-4

I think that speaks for itself. Run along now, I’m sure there is some glue to be sniffed or a spot at ITT to be applied for, you must not waste time.

By: Daniel

Daniel — Fri, 30 Jul 2010 03:55:09 +0000

MOVE ON. WE WON THE NATIONAL CHAMPIONSHIP IN 1981. 29 years have passed since then…Pretty safe bet it won’t be taken away by the NCAA.

How about you go have your best season ever ended by NAVY. That was what, ’84? Got your first bowl win 11 years later? Most recently, Gamecock football was last seen losing to the powerhouse that is Connecticut in some who-gives-a-shit bowl game.

And yes, to address the other Cock talking point, I realize the SEC is a more difficult conference than the ACC but it’s your own fault you can’t compete in it. Being in a powerhouse conference does not make you a powerhouse program.

By: Sambo

Sambo — Fri, 30 Jul 2010 02:07:52 +0000

Clemson Football Championships – 1
Sakerlina Football Championships – 0

Scoreboard.

By: Chili

Chili — Fri, 30 Jul 2010 01:39:59 +0000

I should probably just move on from this whole thing. Anyway, I think his main points are that we cheated to win the title in 81 that we still talk about incessantly and that we gave inadequate coverage to the losses to the Gamecocks in baseball. Surely there’s some truth to all of those, but what title winning schools didn’t have their own issues? Until Clemson experiences some kind of great success (ACC Title, BCS bowl victory, BCS Championship) I don’t think it’s ridiculous for ’81 to still be the measuring stick and a point of conversation. I still hear Sakerlina fans blabber on about “Black Magic” all the time, so what? Again, though, don’t sit here and reference Colin Cowherd. You’re better than that, Beau, surely. That guy is a cunt, and nobody from the Pacific Northwest should have their opinion on college football taken seriously by anyone, especially not Southerners.

By: Willy Mac

Willy Mac — Fri, 30 Jul 2010 01:14:55 +0000

Actually to tell you the truth, I covered what, one week of baseball? You can check the record, we’ve been pretty much absent for most of the warm weather months.

Also, dude, seriously. You seem to have that same sourness that accompanies gamecock fans everywhere. Eww. Yucky. Take the attitude, and your tire retreading buddies and crawl back to what ever messageboard you came from.

By: Beau

Beau — Fri, 30 Jul 2010 00:19:49 +0000

Oh good grief. Spelling errors? Really? I’m already ahead in the this exchange. When your rebuttal begins with spelling corrections, you’re struggling…

Have some more quotation marks…

“On November 21, 1982, the football program was placed on probation for a 2-year period to include the 1983 and 1984 seasons. This sanction was enforced on the program by the NCAA Committee on Infractions due to a lengthy history of recruiting violations to gain an athletic advantage that had taken place from 1977 through the Tigers’ 1981 National Championship season and into 1982, under the administration of two head coaches, Charlie Pell and Danny Ford. The Atlantic Coast Conference imposed a third year of conference penalty.

Over 150 documented violations were found to have been committed under NCAA bylaws in the categories of improper recruiting inducements, extra benefits to student-athletes, ethical conduct, improper financial aid, improper campus visits, improper transportation and entertainment, improper use of funds, improper employment, improper recruiting contact, and distribution of cash to players by members of the coaching staff.[1]

As a result of these violations, Clemson was barred from participating in bowl games following the 1982 and 1983 seasons, and barred from appearing on live television in the 1983 and 1984 seasons. Also, the number of scholarships that the university could allocate to football players was restricted to 20 (from the normal limit of 30) for the 1983-84 and 1984-85 academic years. The Tigers, however, were allowed to keep their 1978 and 1981 ACC titles as well as the 1981 national title.”

Allowed to keep those titles. Wow, you guys must be so proud. LOL!

No, you didn’t hafta to cover our wins…but it is pretty amusing to see baseball coverage, baseball coverage, baseball coverage…nothing…it’s like the rapture occured and Clemson baseball disappeared into thin air.